W związku z moim poprzednim pytaniem ostatnio oglądałem wykład Seana Carrolla wygłoszonego podczas Scepticon 5 gdzie twierdzi że cytuję:
Link do wspomnianego wykładu.
Czyli jednak takie cząstki jak elektrony czy fotony są tak naprawdę falami w różnych polach kwantowych?
Oraz w tej publikacji Quantum mechanics: Myths and facts znajduję podobne wnioski:
To jak to w końcu jest we współczesnej fizyce elektrony, fotony to cząstki, fale, żadne z nich, a może coś zupełnie odmiennego?
Cytat:[...] at every point in space there's a field called the magnetic field at every point in space there's a field called the electric field at every point in space is a field called the neutrino field there's a field called the up quark field every particle every piece of reality that you've heard of is ultimately coming from a field. So quantum field theory says that literally everything is just some kind wave in some quantum field or another.[...] You've heard about waves verses particle and if you took just enough but not quite really enough physics education you know there's this complicated question. Are electrons or photons really waves or they are really particles? And there are many people in the world who've heard that question and still haven't known what the answer is and the answer is their waves. That's the right answer it's not a debate we know which is right which is wright and which is wrong the world is made of waves
Link do wspomnianego wykładu.
Czyli jednak takie cząstki jak elektrony czy fotony są tak naprawdę falami w różnych polach kwantowych?
Oraz w tej publikacji Quantum mechanics: Myths and facts znajduję podobne wnioski:
Cytat:From that, widely accepted, point of view, there is nothing dual about QM; electrons and photons always behave as waves, while a particlelike behavior corresponds only to a special case (1). In this sense, the wave-particle duality is nothing but a myth.
To jak to w końcu jest we współczesnej fizyce elektrony, fotony to cząstki, fale, żadne z nich, a może coś zupełnie odmiennego?

